The Objective Review: Our mission

Today:

I want to humanize the news and get back to common sense observations to inform the general public at large. This mission doesn’t come easily to me in the world of media today. In order to be sure the public is informed without a blood thirst for sensationalism and ratings, against the expectations of mainstream media, I had to forge my own mission. I mention all of this to say that while we all take different paths, for most of us, journalism is a calling, not simply an adventure. So be it not an outlandish idea that personal missions drive what we do as journalists.

These missions embody what we value most. Maybe we want to help others, or uncover corruption and the abuse of power. Maybe we want to understand and explain how things work, or create positive change in our communities.

The challenge we face, though, is that the longer we stay in the business, the more we’re apt to forget why we got into it. That’s why writing a personal mission statement can be helpful, because it can remind us about our passions.

As journalists we treat the public fairly and openly. Whatever the issue, we tell our audiences the complete, unvarnished truth as best we can learn it. We correct our errors explicitly as soon as we become aware of them.

Any member of The Objective Review who deals with the public is expected to honor that principle, knowing that ultimately the public is our employer. Civility applies whether an exchange takes place in person, by telephone, by letter or by e-mail.

We gather information for the benefit of the people. Journalists at The Objective Review, or on assignment for one of its newsrooms, may not use their position to make inquiries for any other purpose.

We treat news sources fairly and professionally. We do not inquire pointlessly into someone’s personal life. We do not threaten to damage uncooperative sources, nor do we promise favorable coverage in return for cooperation. We do not pay for interviews or unpublished documents: to do so would create an incentive for sources to falsify material and would cast into doubt the genuineness of much that we publish.

Staff members and others on assignment for us should disclose their identity to people they cover, though they need not always announce their occupation when seeking information normally available to the public. Those working for us as journalists may not pose as anyone they are not – for example, police officers or lawyers.

Critics and other writers who review performances or goods and services offered to the public may conceal their press identity, but they may not normally assert a false identity or affiliation.

Staff members and others on assignment for us must obey the law in the gathering of news. They may not break into buildings, homes, apartments or offices.

Web pages and Web logs present imaginative opportunities for personal expression and exciting new journalism. When created by our staff or published on our Web sites, they also require cautions, magnified by the Web’s unlimited reach.

What is our mission?

To Expose…
To Enlighten…
To Commemorate…

“so it is to the printing press–to the recorder of man’s deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news–that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.” ~John F. Kennedy

“The greater the importance of safeguarding the community from incitements to the overthrow of our institutions by force and violence, the more imperative is the need to preserve inviolate the constitutional rights of free speech, free press and free assembly in order to maintain the opportunity for free political discussion, to the end that government may be responsive to the will of the people.”

New York Times Co. v. US 403 U.S. 713 No. 1873

Contributing to the people with passion and diligence through vigorous and tedious research to get the facts out for an objective review.

The Florida Constitution in article 1 located at section 4 states: Freedom of speech and press.—Every person may speak, write and publish sentiments on all subjects but shall be responsible for the abuse of that right. No law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all criminal prosecutions and civil actions for defamation the truth may be given in evidence. ’If the matter charged as defamatory is true and was published with good motives, the party shall be acquitted or exonerated.’

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

… this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

~THE OBJECTIVE REVIEW~

Contact us:
http://www.theobjectivereview.com
info@theobjectivereview.com

The Objective Review: Our mission

Today’s Mission:

I want to humanize the news and get back to common sense observations to inform the general public at large. This mission doesn’t come easily to me in the world of media today. In order to be sure the public is informed without a blood thirst for sensationalism and ratings, against the expectations of mainstream media, I had to forge my own mission. I mention all of this to say that while we all take different paths, for most of us, journalism is a calling, not simply an adventure. So be it not an outlandish idea that personal missions drive what we do as journalists.

These missions embody what we value most. Maybe we want to help others, or uncover corruption and the abuse of power. Maybe we want to understand and explain how things work, or create positive change in our communities.

The challenge we face, though, is that the longer we stay in the business, the more we’re apt to forget why we got into it. That’s why writing a personal mission statement can be helpful, because it can remind us about our passions.

As journalists we treat the public fairly and openly. Whatever the issue, we tell our audiences the complete, unvarnished truth as best we can learn it. We correct our errors explicitly as soon as we become aware of them.

Any member of The Objective Review who deals with the public is expected to honor that principle, knowing that ultimately the public is our employer. Civility applies whether an exchange takes place in person, by telephone, by letter or by e-mail.

We gather information for the benefit of the people. Journalists at The Objective Review, or on assignment for one of its newsrooms, may not use their position to make inquiries for any other purpose.

We treat news sources fairly and professionally. We do not inquire pointlessly into someone’s personal life. We do not threaten to damage uncooperative sources, nor do we promise favorable coverage in return for cooperation. We do not pay for interviews or unpublished documents: to do so would create an incentive for sources to falsify material and would cast into doubt the genuineness of much that we publish.

Staff members and others on assignment for us should disclose their identity to people they cover, though they need not always announce their occupation when seeking information normally available to the public. Those working for us as journalists may not pose as anyone they are not – for example, police officers or lawyers.

Critics and other writers who review performances or goods and services offered to the public may conceal their press identity, but they may not normally assert a false identity or affiliation.

Staff members and others on assignment for us must obey the law in the gathering of news. They may not break into buildings, homes, apartments or offices.

Web pages and Web logs present imaginative opportunities for personal expression and exciting new journalism. When created by our staff or published on our Web sites, they also require cautions, magnified by the Web’s unlimited reach.

What is our mission?

To Expose…
To Enlighten…
To Commemorate…

“so it is to the printing press–to the recorder of man’s deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news–that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.” ~John F. Kennedy

“The greater the importance of safeguarding the community from incitements to the overthrow of our institutions by force and violence, the more imperative is the need to preserve inviolate the constitutional rights of free speech, free press and free assembly in order to maintain the opportunity for free political discussion, to the end that government may be responsive to the will of the people.”

New York Times Co. v. US 403 U.S. 713 No. 1873

Contributing to the people with passion and diligence through vigorous and tedious research to get the facts out for an objective review.

The Florida Constitution in article 1 located at section 4 states: Freedom of speech and press.—Every person may speak, write and publish sentiments on all subjects but shall be responsible for the abuse of that right. No law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all criminal prosecutions and civil actions for defamation the truth may be given in evidence. ’If the matter charged as defamatory is true and was published with good motives, the party shall be acquitted or exonerated.’

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

… this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

~THE OBJECTIVE REVIEW~

Contact us:
http://www.theobjectivereview.com
info@theobjectivereview.com

Strange Breaking News: Outbreak in Ocala Florida (Photos)

Strange Breaking News: Outbreak in Ocala Florida (Photos)

 

After investigation, May 11 2013, of the Ocala City Hall outbreak, it appears information may have been known previous to the events of last night. A report of interviews with public officials and the local citizens has been uncovered as to the source responsible for the event.Ocala, a peaceful community, experienced the disturbance in the vicinity of the downtown square just after 6 P.M. Friday.

The participants seemed to be in a trance with a hunger and desire never seen before. The event shook the foundations of reality deep into the night hours. Citizens appeared like villagers to fend off the unquenchable hunger of what once lay dead and lost. Throughcreativity and innovative ingenuity it appears Bronson Mosley managed to catch the occurrence on video with the help offamily and friends.

Ocala Resident appears to be examining outbreak infection
Ocala Resident appears to be examining outbreak infection
Photo credit:
Only Another Day Community Film Project

© 2013 Nokia© 2013 Microsoft Corporation
Location: Ocala City Manager

29.185302 ; -82.133515

Despite fear, madness and complete insanity, a man survived hiding in the bushes located at the edge of the steps leading to the entrance of Ocala City Hall. Though the man’s name is still unknown, it is reported he saved the lives of a few locals fleeing to the doors in the entry way. A lady screaming could be heard in the street as it appearssomeone or something was chasing her. At this time it is not known whether or not she survived the outbreak.

The day before it is reported an interview was conducted at Ocala City Hall about the outbreak, before it actually took place. Bronson Mosley met with an Ocala City Official to speak with them a day before the outbreak took place. It appears the outbreak may have been contained by the proper planning and preparations put in place by Only Another Day and the city official.

Due to the many members of the community and open communication with the local government the event ended in success. Photographers and reporters rushed to the scene taking as many photographs and statements as ‘humanly’ possible. Statements from interviews and reports are being released to answer the questions circulating among the communities.

What happened in downtown Ocala Friday night?

Who was involved?

Why did this happen?

How could this happen?

Where did the outbreak come from?

The most important question is currently being investigated.

Who has survived?

This has been a breaking news report, with strange news from Ocala, Florida with The Objective Review.

Federal funding fraud at the expense of abused, abducted and exploited children

Federal funding fraud at the expense of abused, abducted and exploited children

By: Correspondent Joseph Kirk 28 April 2013

Funding fraud on the backs of Brevard County children
Funding fraud on the backs of Brevard County children
Credits:
Getty Images/Paula Bronstein

A local father speaks out for children and families everywhere from Brevard County Florida. The current conditions of the system and its abuses of discretion appear appalling to say the least. When individuals improperly use the system for personal financial gain and kickbacks at the expense of children it is clear that the children suffer the most.

It is astonishing the amount of Title IV-E Funding, and all the money that comes along with it, is made off the backs of children who are sold into slavery. As you read this you will see the States are rewarded for adopting out children. They make a bonus and they make a bigger bonus when they adopt out older kids.

This father has launched a petition with the White House located at https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/stop-individuals-form-defrauding-federal-government-billions-incentive-destroy-children-and-families/kN5038rT. Which accurately details the actions currently taking place in Brevard County Florida link by link. The current abuses committed against vulnerable children and their families can only be viewed as another means of funding fraud.

© 2012 Nokia© 2013 Microsoft Corporation
Location: 2825 judge fran jamieson way, viera, fl

28.24566078186 ; -80.739463806152

Previously the Government Accountability Office conducted a test with 5 states. The five states GAO tested lacked controls over child care assistance application and billing processes for unregulated relative providers, leaving the program vulnerable to fraud and abuse. Posing as fictitious parents and relative providers, GAO successfully billed for $11,702 in child care assistance for fictitious children and parents. In most cases, states approved GAO’s fictitious parents who used Social Security numbers of deceased individuals and claimed to work at nonexistent companies. One state also approved a fictitious child care provider with a deceased person’s Social Security number, creating the possibility that a criminal using a stolen identity could obtain federal subsidies to care for children.

More info found here: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-1062

So at this time it appears the funding fraud has moved from the fictitious and deceased to real live families and their children being destroyed and exploited. According to a study by the Government Accountability Office Funds authorized under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act make up the large majority of federal child welfare funds, but are designated for purposes such as providing room and board payments for children in foster care and subsidies to adoptive parents, and generally cannot be used for child welfare services. However, 14 states have waivers allowing them to use these funds more flexibly to improve child and family outcomes. Among GAO’s selected states, Florida had a waiver allowing it to use some Title IV-E funds for in-home services designed to prevent foster care placement.

More info found here: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-170

To learn more about the Government Accountability Office and who to contact about suspected fraud you can find that information here: www.gao.gov/about/index.html.

Although these funds are supposed to be used to prevent children from being removed they are often removed while individuals pretend to provide those services. The average individual in an everyday family setting would not know who to turn to if their child were taken by simulated legal process. Furthermore, how can they compete when the other party has an unlimited supply of financial resources?

The federal government is a vast money transfer machine. It spends hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars each year on subsidy programs—from the massive Medicare to hundreds of more obscure programs that most people have never heard of. There are more than 1,800 federal subsidy programs.

With such a huge array of handouts, the federal budget has become victim to large-scale fraud and abuse—that is, people taking government benefits to which they are not entitled. Just about every subsidy program suffers from fraud and abuse. Losses to federal taxpayers from fraud, abuse, and other types of improper payments are in the ballpark of $100 billion a year or more. Here we can see that the dollars and cents are adding up quickly, being waged upon the backs of America’s youth.

This father had his child abducted by a grandmother who committed fraud and gained that funding through the simulated legal processes of her alleged accomplice Attorney Scarlett G. Davidson. A video was posted on youtube showing the finding of fact. Video located here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22bYeSfvXd4

Although the child has military insurance the grandmother obtained medicaid to pay for psychotropic drugs for the child which were prescribed without any diagnosis. Florida Statute 39.407 specifically defines how the use of psychotropic drugs can be provided along with Florida Administrative codes 65E and 65C. However, the grandmother was able to obtain medicaid to pay for prescriptions without any diagnosis, parental consent or a judges order. The father has posted a video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7e0ahkVOXaw

Often the people committing funding fraud and the like are skilled legal professionals as the father outlines with 4 videos. The father also shows a non-legal document towards the end of video 4 as shown below.

1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPkE8N2Y8rQ

2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hex9kLFekk

3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIUPQaPLsvw

4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcGp-AC6P2M

This father has never had the chance to defend himself at any point for a period of 3 years and has posted pictures and notations at the following links, entitled Truth, expressing his opinions of the actions taking place in Brevard County Florida.

1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSgT1wNqc8I

2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sj9sxwaiAc

In closing it appears there is a lot more going on in Brevard County than most are willing to talk about and the father has asked families everywhere to respond by signing the following petition launched at https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/stop-individuals-form-defraudi…

This has been another objective review.