News Alert: Federal funding fraud at the expense of abused, abducted and exploited children

APRIL 29, 2013
Funding fraud on the backs of Brevard County children
Funding fraud on the backs of Brevard County children
Credits:
Getty Images/Paula Bronstein

A local father speaks out for children and families everywhere from Brevard County Florida. The current conditions of the system and its abuses of discretion appear appalling to say the least. When individuals improperly use the system for personal financial gain and kickbacks at the expense of children it is clear that the children suffer the most.

Previously the Government Accountability Office conducted a test with 5 states. The five states GAO tested lacked controls over child care assistance application and billing processes for unregulated relative providers, leaving the program vulnerable to fraud and abuse. Posing as fictitious parents and relative providers, GAO successfully billed for $11,702 in child care assistance for fictitious children and parents. In most cases, states approved GAO’s fictitious parents who used Social Security numbers of deceased individuals and claimed to work at nonexistent companies. One state also approved a fictitious child care provider with a deceased person’s Social Security number, creating the possibility that a criminal using a stolen identity could obtain federal subsidies to care for children.

More info found here.

So at this time it appears the funding fraud has moved from the fictitious and deceased to real live families and their children being destroyed and exploited. According to a study by the Government Accountability Office Funds authorized under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act make up the large majority of federal child welfare funds, but are designated for purposes such as providing room and board payments for children in foster care and subsidies to adoptive parents, and generally cannot be used for child welfare services. However, 14 states have waivers allowing them to use these funds more flexibly to improve child and family outcomes. Among GAO’s selected states, Florida had a waiver allowing it to use some Title IV-E funds for in-home services designed to prevent foster care placement.

More info found here: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-170

To learn more about the Government Accountability Office and who to contact about suspected fraud you can find that information by clicking this link.

Although these funds are supposed to be used to prevent children from being removed they are often removed while individuals pretend to provide those services. The average individual in an everyday family setting would not know who to turn to if their child were taken by simulated legal process. Furthermore, how can they compete when the other party has an unlimited supply of financial resources?

The federal government is a vast money transfer machine. It spends hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars each year on subsidy programs—from the massive Medicare to hundreds of more obscure programs that most people have never heard of. There are more than 1,800 federal subsidy programs.

With such a huge array of handouts, the federal budget has become victim to large-scale fraud and abuse—that is, people taking government benefits to which they are not entitled. Just about every subsidy program suffers from fraud and abuse. Losses to federal taxpayers from fraud,abuse, and other types of improper payments are in the ballpark of $100 billion a year or more. Here we can see that the dollars and cents are adding up quickly, being waged upon the backs of America’s youth.

This father had his child abducted by a grandmother who committed fraud and gained that funding through the simulated legal processes of her alleged accomplice Attorney Scarlett G. Davidson. A video was posted on youtube showing the finding of fact.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsqqDnx93xE

Although the child has military insurance the grandmother obtained medicaid to pay for psychotropic drugs for the child which were prescribed without any diagnosis. Florida Statute 39.407 specifically defines how the use of psychotropic drugs can be provided along with Florida Administrative codes 65E and 65C. However, the grandmother was able to obtain medicaid to pay for prescriptions without any diagnosis, parental consent or a judges order. The father has posted a video here.

Often the people committing funding fraud and the like are skilled legal professionals as the father outlines with 4 videos. The father also shows a non-legal document towards the end of video 4 as shown below.

1. Simulated Legal Process Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxum5HDUJzE

2. Simulated Legal Process Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJY08vprtn4

3. Simulated Legal Process Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiIdhHyhVw0

4. Simulated Legal Process Part 4 with Documentation at end of video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zgfZWH5ZcY

This father has never had the chance to defend himself at any point for a period of 3 years and has posted pictures and notations at the following links, entitled Truth, expressing his opinions of the actions taking place in Brevard County Florida.

1. Review 1

2. Review 2

In closing it would appear there is a lot more going on in Brevard County than most are willing to talk about and the father has asked families everywhere to respond by contacting the Brevard County Sheriff at 321-633-2000 and ask for Sheriff Wayne Ivey to do something about these criminals.

This has been another objective review.

Advertisements

News Alert: Federal funding fraud at the expense of abused, abducted and exploited children

Funding fraud on the backs of Brevard County children

Funding fraud on the backs of Brevard County children
Credits:
Getty Images/Paula Bronstein

A local father speaks out for children and families everywhere from Brevard County Florida. The current conditions of the system and its abuses of discretion appear appalling to say the least. When individuals improperly use the system for personal financial gain and kickbacks at the expense of children it is clear that the children suffer the most.

Previously the Government Accountability Office conducted a test with 5 states. The five states GAO tested lacked controls over child care assistance application and billing processes for unregulated relative providers, leaving the program vulnerable to fraud and abuse. Posing as fictitious parents and relative providers, GAO successfully billed for $11,702 in child care assistance for fictitious children and parents. In most cases, states approved GAO’s fictitious parents who used Social Security numbers of deceased individuals and claimed to work at nonexistent companies. One state also approved a fictitious child care provider with a deceased person’s Social Security number, creating the possibility that a criminal using a stolen identity could obtain federal subsidies to care for children.

More info found here.

So at this time it appears the funding fraud has moved from the fictitious and deceased to real live families and their children being destroyed and exploited. According to a study by the Government Accountability Office Funds authorized under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act make up the large majority of federal child welfare funds, but are designated for purposes such as providing room and board payments for children in foster care and subsidies to adoptive parents, and generally cannot be used for child welfare services. However, 14 states have waivers allowing them to use these funds more flexibly to improve child and family outcomes. Among GAO’s selected states, Florida had a waiver allowing it to use some Title IV-E funds for in-home services designed to prevent foster care placement.

More info found here: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-170

To learn more about the Government Accountability Office and who to contact about suspected fraud you can find that information by clicking this link.

Although these funds are supposed to be used to prevent children from being removed they are often removed while individuals pretend to provide those services. The average individual in an everyday family setting would not know who to turn to if their child were taken by simulated legal process. Furthermore, how can they compete when the other party has an unlimited supply of financial resources?

The federal government is a vast money transfer machine. It spends hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars each year on subsidy programs—from the massive Medicare to hundreds of more obscure programs that most people have never heard of. There are more than 1,800 federal subsidy programs.

With such a huge array of handouts, the federal budget has become victim to large-scale fraud and abuse—that is, people taking government benefits to which they are not entitled. Just about every subsidy program suffers from fraud and abuse. Losses to federal taxpayers from fraud,abuse, and other types of improper payments are in the ballpark of $100 billion a year or more. Here we can see that the dollars and cents are adding up quickly, being waged upon the backs of America’s youth.

This father had his child abducted by a grandmother who committed fraud and gained that funding through the simulated legal processes of her alleged accomplice Attorney Scarlett G. Davidson. A video was posted on youtube showing the finding of fact.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsqqDnx93xE

Although the child has military insurance the grandmother obtained medicaid to pay for psychotropic drugs for the child which were prescribed without any diagnosis. Florida Statute 39.407 specifically defines how the use of psychotropic drugs can be provided along with Florida Administrative codes 65E and 65C. However, the grandmother was able to obtain medicaid to pay for prescriptions without any diagnosis, parental consent or a judges order. The father has posted a video here.

Often the people committing funding fraud and the like are skilled legal professionals as the father outlines with 4 videos. The father also shows a non-legal document towards the end of video 4 as shown below.

1. Simulated Legal Process Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxum5HDUJzE

2. Simulated Legal Process Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJY08vprtn4

3. Simulated Legal Process Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiIdhHyhVw0

4. Simulated Legal Process Part 4 with Documentation at end of video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zgfZWH5ZcY

This father has never had the chance to defend himself at any point for a period of 3 years and has posted pictures and notations at the following links, entitled Truth, expressing his opinions of the actions taking place in Brevard County Florida.

1. Review 1

2. Review 2

In closing it would appear there is a lot more going on in Brevard County than most are willing to talk about and the father has asked families everywhere to respond by contacting the Brevard County Sheriff at 321-633-2000 and ask for Sheriff Wayne Ivey to do something about these criminals.

This has been another objective review.

Breaking news: In Brevard locals team up to conceal crimes

Breaking news: In Brevard locals team up to conceal crimes

Brevard County Sheriff
Credits:
Roberto Gonzalez / Getty Images
 

In Brevard County it appears conspiracy and collusion has become the norm for some locals and attorneys who plot to conceal crimes to beat the statute of limitationsMajor Andrew WaltersBrevard County Sheriff’s Department, stated the statute of limitations had run out and he could not comment on whether a crime was committed or not. Major Walters said there must be a report for them to investigate and he could not investigate if the statute of limitations had run out. Major Walters also stated he had no knowledge of the event until now.

What happened? Who did it? How and why? The answer is simple although it may appear complex.
Location: Brevard County Sheriff

28.607773 ; -80.818566

Andrew Walters has 23-years of law enforcement service with the Brevard CountySheriff’s Office and currently Commands the Sheriff’s North Precinct. Mr. Walters served as the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office spokesperson for over 3 years (2005-2008). At the rank of Major, he served as a Countywide Watch Commander, Commanded the Special Operations Division and served as the Assistant Precinct Commander to North Precinct prior to his current assignment of Commanding the Sheriff’s North Precinct. He is the current President of Brevard County TRIAD Inc., a non-profit organization serving senior citizens in Brevard County. In addition to TRIAD, he serves on the Board of Directors for Central Florida Crimeline and Crosswinds Youth Services.

Accordingly, it would appear at first glance the statute of limitations has run out for a kidnapping that took place May 5th, 2010, found as fact in a court of law on June 17th, 2010, while the Melbourne Police Department made no arrest. Complaints were made about the Melbourne Officers involved and the Chief of Police Steve Mimbs was informed of their actions. Internal affairs would should have head up that investigation as the internal affairs unit is under direct authority of the Chief of Police.

These officers entered conflicting reports that falsify statements made by the parents in aid of the kidnapper, Yvonne Howard, and her attorney Scarlett Davidson of Culmer and Davidson P.A.. This is proven as they refused to issue a missing child report for a period of 2 weeks while the child was missing. At the time, Brevard County Sheriff’s Department said because it had taken place in Melbourne that it was the Melbourne Police Department’s Jurisdictionand they lacked jurisdiction. At that time the parents contacted the Florida Department of Law Enforcement who then contacted the Brevard County Sheriff’s Department who issued the missing child report 2 weeks after the child was kidnapped by Yvonne Howard as found as fact in a court of law according to Florida Statute 787.03 and 787.04.

As a point of law the statute of limitations indeed has run out on the initial act but it was also found by witnesses and 2 Florida Bar certified Attorneys on June 17, 2010 that Yvonne Howard was interfering again, with the ratifying actions of her attorney Scarlett Davidson attempting to conceal those acts, in which the statute of limitations has not run out on. Will they be allowed to avoid prosecution by the limitations again? The limitations on that incident will run out this June in 2013.

 

More Information…

In Brevard Culmer & Davidson P.A. and Judge John Dean Moxley victimize families

In Brevard Culmer & Davidson P.A. and Judge John Dean Moxley victimize families

The Titusville Court House Chambers of persecution
The Titusville Court House Chambers of persecution

On the 15th of May in 2010 Yvonne Howard abducted the child of 2 parents. The child was hidden for over a half a month. Yvonne Howard then filed a petition for a fraudulent private adoption with the aid of Attorney Scarlett Davidson, a partner in Culmer & Davidson P.A. Yvonne Howard lives at 2203 Greenway Drive in Melbourne Florida. She swore under oath she did not know where the parents were. However, it doesn’t take much more than common sense to know she committed perjury. This family was happy until Yvonne Howard was knowingly allowed to perjure belligerently to the court and defy any court orders without the parents having any recourse. It would appear victimizing victims is entertaining to Judge Moxley as whe the victims express their concerns all he does is grin and advocate for the offenders to continue victimizing.

© 2013 Nokia© 2013 Microsoft Corporation
Location: 506 S Palm Ave Titusville, FL 32796

28.609062284231 ; -80.809180811048

Facts:

Yvonne took the child from school never to return on May 5th in 2010 violating Florida Statutes.

The child was hidden never to return to school.

On May 21st she showed up in court, still holding the child for ransom, and stated she had no problems with the father after kidnapping the child and hiding her from him.

On May 21st she also testified she did in fact know her daughter, the mother, lived with her stepfather, Bill Howard, a few blocks away.

This is not the only conflicting statements she made and in fact Attorney Scarlett Davidson Davidson requested if she could testifyfor Yvonne Howard. The fraud didn’t stop there as Attorney Scarlett Davidson being told she couldn’t Testify for Yvonne Howard proceeded to fabricating evidence and witness tampering to say the least. This is not the first time Attorney Scarlett Davidson offered false facts and evidence to the court in a suit she previously represented the case was transferred to Federal Court. Attorney Scarlett Davidson was warned by the Federal Court she could not present herself as a Federal Attorney as she wasn’t licensed to practice in Federal Court.

Attorney Scarelett Davidson also told the Florida Bar no one was trying to adopt the child despite her client kidnapping the child and filing for a private adoption. What is a private adoption? It is when a private individual files for an adoption without the department of Children and Families. You heard that right, the Department of Children and families reported no abuse, abandonment or neglect was found.

However, the child found as fact to be hidden and prevented contact with her parents by Yvonne Howard was later baker acted and reported that Yvonne Howard was threatening to break her fingers while pulling the 11 year old’s hair. Scarlett Davidson then simulated legal process to stop trial before the defense could present their evidence violating due process, Constitutional Rights and Federal Laws.

Although Attorney Scarlett Davidson lied to multiple Judges, also being called out on it by Attorney Ashley Severance, she also lied to the Florida Bar. Judge Moxley was made aware of it and ignored the perjury, fabricating evidence and the tampering with witnesses by both Attorney and client. It appears Judge Moxley sits on a bench of injustice victimizing victims and certifying his approval of murder, sex offenses, abduction and child abuse. Just listen to the 911 tape of the murder here due to Judge Moxley’s wild and reckless actions with concealing evidence and abuses of discretion.

Let us review one of the many Florida Bar Rules Attorney Scarlett Davidson has broken multiple times:

RULE 4-3.3 CANDOR TOWARD THE TRIBUNAL

(a) False Evidence; Duty to Disclose. A lawyer shall not knowingly:

(1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer;

(2) fail to disclose a material fact to a tribunal when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;

(3) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or

(4) offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. A lawyer may not offer testimony that the lawyer knows to be false in the form of a narrative unless so ordered by the tribunal. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client, or a witness called by the lawyer has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.
(b) Criminal or Fraudulent Conduct. A lawyer who represents a client in an adjudicative proceeding and who knows that a person intends to engage, is engaging, or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal.

(c) Ex Parte Proceedings. In an ex parte proceeding a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse.

(d) Extent of Lawyer‘s Duties. The duties stated in this rule continue beyond the conclusion of the proceeding and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by rule 4-1.6.

The child was sexually touched while inadequately supervised by Yvonne Howard and Judge Moxley ignored that too. Greed is no excuse for destroying children and what will the Judge say this time? Is he not omniscient again as he stated to the Orlando Sentinel previously without any remorse? Is he being paid off for his fraud resulting in funding fraud?

The father has launched a petition to stop Federal Funding Fraud with the White House please click this link and sign.

Now there is a website for the people to record the actions of judges in every state. Check it out here for Judge Moxley and leave comments.

More to come.

~The Objective Review~

Orlando News

Suggested by the author:

John Dean Moxley a negligent Brevard County Judge is in the news again

BREVARD COUNTYAPRIL 30, 2013 BY: JOSEPH KIRK

It appears John Dean Moxley a Brevard Conty Judge has sat on the bench for injustice again. Moxley, a judge in the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court located in Brevard County, previously denied an injunction for protection that resulted in a 23 year old girl being shot to death. It appears Moxley consistently favors chaotic and senseless decisions. Does this judge have common sense or are the actions of this judge intentionally malicious towards society and the public good in general?

“As a judge you have to follow the law. You’re not omniscient. God bless her soul.”, were the words Judge Moxley said to the Orlando Sentinel after his poor decision making resulted in a young girl’s death. WFTV Chanel 9 News covered the previous story and the documents were extremely revealing of the gross negligence committed by this judge.

Alissa Blanton was only 23 when she was gunned down and bled to death in her husband’s arms dying shortly after at the hospital. “I drove by your house to see if it was true. I can honestly tell you, and this is not because of the way you treated me, that is the ugliest nastiest color I have ever seen on a house, especially in fl,” were the chilling words in an email by Troy, who gunned her down after Moxley denied Blanton’s petition for protection.

“The evidence was there and, in retrospect, I am puzzled why he wouldn’t have erred on the side of caution,” WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said.

WFTV, obtained a document from the Judicial Qualifications Commission showing Judge Moxley is under review over a complaint made in another case. He has been accused of making a ruling in that case without thoroughly reviewing the case file. Apparently, this isn’t the first time he has been accused of being soft on crime:

Career criminal Steven Lunn said in May, 2003: “I like Moxley. He knows me. I got a problem, he’ll take care of it.”

Moxley released violent criminal Derrick Henderson in February, 2003 on his signature days before he was to go to prison for six years. He disappeared.

Moxley lowered an accused child molester’s bond so he could get out of jail after being accused of stalking 12- and 13-year-old girls.

Judge Moxley has been on the bench for 25 years. He was re-elected in 2008 without opposition. He is up for re-election in 2014. He makes $142,000/year.

Today Judge Moxley has continued his legacy of chaos and abuses of discretion again, as he claims he is not omniscient, or all knowing as defined. This time he is on the record and recklessly disregarding documents from the Florida bar. Judge Moxley stated “I’m not noticing anything from the Florida Bar“, as he was months prior, given copies of documents pertaining to the fraudulent adoption plan taking place in his courtroom. One of the documents was a Florida bar response from Attorney Scarlett Davidson which put forth to the Florida Bar she had not filed any adoption petition and that no one was trying to adopt the child.However, attached to the notice to Judge Moxley in the fraudulent adoption case was a certified copy of the cover sheet stating it was for an adoption.

The child was kidnapped by Yvonne Howard and hidden for over half a month who then appeared in court and lodged the defense she had no problems with the father. Yvonne Howard, to be clear, as a finding of fact hid the child without any court order and prevented any contact with the child. This fact was found by the Honorable Judge Crawford who was the original judge on the case. Yvonne Howard was then clearly allowed to commit perjury and alienate the child by violating court orders without any recourse due to all the procedural and civil rights violations. Yvonne Howard testified that the father had never harmed the child and the department of children and families declared they did not file the petition through out the case. In fact it was a private petition by Yvonne Howard and her attorney Scarlett Davidson.

Since you have to terminate parental rights for an adoption various actions were pursued by Yvonne Howard and Scarlett Davidson under color of law. These actions even violated federal law as Supervising Attorney Cassandra Elken stated to Judge Moxley months before. Elken is the supervising attorney for the Florida Department of Children and Families who stood up and stated “Federal laws were violated in this case”. Attorney Scarlett Davidson even resorted to witness tampering by having the father arrested for serving her a subpoena to get her testimony. Since there was no abuse abandonment or neglect, Judge Moxley allowed Attorney Scarlett Davidson to amend her petition to terminate parental rights for her having the father arrested. More news to come.

 

Check Back at:

http://www.examiner.com/courts-4-in-orlando/joseph-kirk

Federal funding fraud at the expense of abused, abducted and exploited children

Federal funding fraud at the expense of abused, abducted and exploited children

By: Correspondent Joseph Kirk 28 April 2013

Funding fraud on the backs of Brevard County children
Funding fraud on the backs of Brevard County children
Credits:
Getty Images/Paula Bronstein

A local father speaks out for children and families everywhere from Brevard County Florida. The current conditions of the system and its abuses of discretion appear appalling to say the least. When individuals improperly use the system for personal financial gain and kickbacks at the expense of children it is clear that the children suffer the most.

It is astonishing the amount of Title IV-E Funding, and all the money that comes along with it, is made off the backs of children who are sold into slavery. As you read this you will see the States are rewarded for adopting out children. They make a bonus and they make a bigger bonus when they adopt out older kids.

This father has launched a petition with the White House located at https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/stop-individuals-form-defrauding-federal-government-billions-incentive-destroy-children-and-families/kN5038rT. Which accurately details the actions currently taking place in Brevard County Florida link by link. The current abuses committed against vulnerable children and their families can only be viewed as another means of funding fraud.

© 2012 Nokia© 2013 Microsoft Corporation
Location: 2825 judge fran jamieson way, viera, fl

28.24566078186 ; -80.739463806152

Previously the Government Accountability Office conducted a test with 5 states. The five states GAO tested lacked controls over child care assistance application and billing processes for unregulated relative providers, leaving the program vulnerable to fraud and abuse. Posing as fictitious parents and relative providers, GAO successfully billed for $11,702 in child care assistance for fictitious children and parents. In most cases, states approved GAO’s fictitious parents who used Social Security numbers of deceased individuals and claimed to work at nonexistent companies. One state also approved a fictitious child care provider with a deceased person’s Social Security number, creating the possibility that a criminal using a stolen identity could obtain federal subsidies to care for children.

More info found here: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-1062

So at this time it appears the funding fraud has moved from the fictitious and deceased to real live families and their children being destroyed and exploited. According to a study by the Government Accountability Office Funds authorized under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act make up the large majority of federal child welfare funds, but are designated for purposes such as providing room and board payments for children in foster care and subsidies to adoptive parents, and generally cannot be used for child welfare services. However, 14 states have waivers allowing them to use these funds more flexibly to improve child and family outcomes. Among GAO’s selected states, Florida had a waiver allowing it to use some Title IV-E funds for in-home services designed to prevent foster care placement.

More info found here: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-170

To learn more about the Government Accountability Office and who to contact about suspected fraud you can find that information here: www.gao.gov/about/index.html.

Although these funds are supposed to be used to prevent children from being removed they are often removed while individuals pretend to provide those services. The average individual in an everyday family setting would not know who to turn to if their child were taken by simulated legal process. Furthermore, how can they compete when the other party has an unlimited supply of financial resources?

The federal government is a vast money transfer machine. It spends hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars each year on subsidy programs—from the massive Medicare to hundreds of more obscure programs that most people have never heard of. There are more than 1,800 federal subsidy programs.

With such a huge array of handouts, the federal budget has become victim to large-scale fraud and abuse—that is, people taking government benefits to which they are not entitled. Just about every subsidy program suffers from fraud and abuse. Losses to federal taxpayers from fraud, abuse, and other types of improper payments are in the ballpark of $100 billion a year or more. Here we can see that the dollars and cents are adding up quickly, being waged upon the backs of America’s youth.

This father had his child abducted by a grandmother who committed fraud and gained that funding through the simulated legal processes of her alleged accomplice Attorney Scarlett G. Davidson. A video was posted on youtube showing the finding of fact. Video located here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22bYeSfvXd4

Although the child has military insurance the grandmother obtained medicaid to pay for psychotropic drugs for the child which were prescribed without any diagnosis. Florida Statute 39.407 specifically defines how the use of psychotropic drugs can be provided along with Florida Administrative codes 65E and 65C. However, the grandmother was able to obtain medicaid to pay for prescriptions without any diagnosis, parental consent or a judges order. The father has posted a video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7e0ahkVOXaw

Often the people committing funding fraud and the like are skilled legal professionals as the father outlines with 4 videos. The father also shows a non-legal document towards the end of video 4 as shown below.

1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPkE8N2Y8rQ

2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hex9kLFekk

3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIUPQaPLsvw

4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcGp-AC6P2M

This father has never had the chance to defend himself at any point for a period of 3 years and has posted pictures and notations at the following links, entitled Truth, expressing his opinions of the actions taking place in Brevard County Florida.

1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSgT1wNqc8I

2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sj9sxwaiAc

In closing it appears there is a lot more going on in Brevard County than most are willing to talk about and the father has asked families everywhere to respond by signing the following petition launched at https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/stop-individuals-form-defraudi…

This has been another objective review.

Rock Out The Violence Event At Wickham Park

Rock Out The Violence Event At Wickham Park

Domestic Violence Fundraiser

Author: Journalist Joseph Kirk | Melbourne, Florida, 26.04.2013

Brevard County Sheriffs Source: http://www.facebook.com/BrevardCountySheriff

Victims Often Silenced
Source: Public Domain

GNA – “Domestic Violence comes in many forms with an everyday changing world it is important that law enforcement continue in their education and be informed. Will some of those funds be used to seek better training and response time to protect those victims?” ~Journalist Joseph Kirk The Objective Review

“I would like to personally thank the members of our Reserve Unit, Bomb Unit, and K-9 Team who worked today’s “Rock Out The Violence” event at Wickham Park. The annual event raises money to help support victims of Domestic Violence in Brevard County. Our team members were instrumental in the success of the event and I greatly appreciate their participation for such a great cause.” ~Sheriff Wayne Ivey
“Domestic victimization is often under reported for reasons such as intimidation, embarrassment, lack of resources and isolation to the world, making victims feel almost incapable of leaving.” ~University of Illinois Springfield Journal Journalist Cameryn BarbeauJuanita Ortiz, UIS criminal justice professor, said, “Oftentimes, the victim feels scared to leave a relationship because they know what the abuser is capable of, and they fear even further harm based on threats about what would happen if they attempt to leave. Such threats can involve harm against the victims, their children, family members, friends or even pets. Abusers can even threaten to kill or hurt themselves and blame it on the victim’s attempts to leave.”
However, there are obvious and painful problems with some domestic violence policies and practices. Too often public policy makers ignore the empirically based policy relevant findings of National Institute of Justice (NIJ) sponsored studies. Too often domestic violence advocates and public policy makers do not even know these studies exist.Many NIJ studies document mandatory policies, practices and “one-solution-fits-all” criminal justice intervention processes have produced some unintended negative consequences. These mandatory polices and practices can save some lives and can make some families safer. However, at the same time NIJ studies documents they can have some negative effects and endanger victims they are intended to protect.

Children Living In Fear
Source: Public Domain

All to often children are left without a voice or placed in harms way by the failure or abuse of the systems designed to protect them. All to often policy makers and the officers charged to enforce them forget their common purpose and sense of duty. That common purpose is to serve and protect. These policies are often referred to as law. However the law in the united states is defined under article VI of the United States Constitution. That law is the supreme law of the land and is designed to ensure life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for peace and prosperity. The protection of our youth ensures our legacy of life to continue on for generations to come. What is a law enforcement officer? Its meaning and definition are as plainly understood as the words are written. A citizen that enforces the law as defined in the United States Constitution under Article VI. This is the very reason to be a law enforcement officer those officers are required take the oath to uphold and defend the Constitutions which vest them with lawful authority.

What is LAW? What are Statutes or in some states code? What are rights? What are public policies? What is the common defense? At first it sounds confusing but when examined it is all too simple.Conflicting statutes, policies without awareness can effect our youth and our nation this is why the nation as a whole “we the people” guaranteed a republic form of government.I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,
and to the Republic for which it stands,
one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

WE THE PEOPLE
Source: Public Domain

In the Pledge of Allegiance we all pledge allegiance to our Republic, not to a democracy. “Republic” is the proper description of our government, not “democracy.” I invite you to join me in raising public awareness regarding that distinction. A republican form of government is a type of government in which the citizens of a country have an active role in the affairs of the government, and the government is not headed by a hereditary ruler such as a king. A republic and a democracy are identical in every aspect except one. In a republic the sovereignty is in each individual person. In a democracy the sovereignty is in the group. In the constitutional republic of the United States of America the government is headed by a President, and includes branches of government which oversee legislation and judiciary matters. There are lots of ways to set up and administer a republican form of government. The important thing to remember is that such a government is not a democracy. Democracy as a concept is integrated into America’s republican form of government to be fair to the citizens giving it authority to govern, but it is also possible to see abuses of power and a ruling class in a republican form of government.

A statute is a written law passed by a legislature on the state or federal level. Statutes set forth general propositions of law that courts apply to specific situations. A statute may forbid a certain act, direct a certain act, make a declaration, or set forth governmental mechanisms to aid society.The power of statutes over other forms of laws is not complete, however. Under the U.S. Constitution and state constitutions, federal and state governments are comprised of a system of checks and balances among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. As the system of checks and balances plays out, the executive and judicial branches have the opportunity to fashion laws within certain limits.
The Executive Branch may possess certain lawmaking powers under the federal or state constitutions, and the judiciary has the power to review statutes to determine whether they are valid under those constitutions. When a court strikes down a statute, it in effect creates a law of its own that applies to the general public.Laws created through judicial opinion stand in contradistinction to laws created in statutes. Case law has the same legally binding effect as statutory law, but there are important distinctions between statutes and case law. Case law is written by judges, not by elected lawmakers, and it is written in response to a specific case before the court.
A judicial opinion may be used as precedent for similar cases, however. This means that the judicial opinion in the case will guide the result in similar cases. In this sense a judicial opinion can constitute the law on certain issues within a particular jurisdiction. Courts can establish law in this way when no statute exists to govern a case, or when the court interprets a statute.Judicial opinions also provide legal authority in cases that are not covered by statute. Legislatures have not passed statutes that govern every conceivable dispute. Furthermore, the language contained in statutes does not cover every possible situation.
Courts tend to follow a few general rules in determining the meaning or scope of a statute. If a statute does not provide satisfactory definitions of ambiguous terms, courts must interpret the words or phrases according to ordinary rules of grammar and dictionary definitions. If a word or phrase is technical or legal, it is interpreted within the context of the statute. For example, the term interest can refer to a monetary charge or ownership of property. If the term interest appears in the context of a statute on real estate ownership, a court will construe the word to mean property ownership. Previous interpretations of similar statutes are also helpful in determining a statute’s meaning.

THE FRAMERS AT THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION
Source: en.wikipedia.org – The Free Encyclopedia

“Police work is often lionized by jurists and scholars who claim to employ “textualist” and “originalist” methods of constitutional interpretation. Yet professional police were unknown to the United States in 1789, and first appeared in America almost a half-century after the Constitution’s ratification. The Framers contemplated law enforcement as the duty of mostly private citizens, along with a few constables and sheriffs who could be called upon when necessary. This article marshals extensive historical and legal evidence to show that modern policing is in many ways inconsistent with the original intent of America’s founding documents. The author argues that the growth of modern policing has substantially empowered the state in a way the Framers would regard as abhorrent to their foremost principles.” ~Seton Hall Constitutional L.J. 2001, 685

Where does all that money go? Certainly I would hope not to such things as this:

GNA – So with an objective observation, can it be implied the receptionist must sit comfortably behind their glass window in a spacious office? Are the rooms being used for the children and visitation too small? Children confined…

Click here for more: danger-or-safety-the-privitization-of-brevard-county-family-court-services

So what about those children being exploited and abused while officers sit quietly by and are intimidated by attorneys?What can Law enforcement do?Thomas Paine said it best… “use common sense”.Any issue before a review no matter how complex always started by a simple act. The complexities are often a distraction and amid those distractions one important fact is often forgotten.

……. The Victim.

Danger or Safety? The privitization of Brevard County Family Court Services

Danger or Safety? The privitization of Brevard County Family Court Services

Supervised Visitation

Author: Journalist Joseph Kirk | Rockledge, Florida, 27.04.2013

Is this the future of family court visitation? Source: Public Domain

Is this the future for our children?
Source: images.learnsoc.org

GNA – So with an objective observation, can it be implied the receptionist must sit comfortably behind their glass window in a spacious office? Are the rooms being used for the children and visitation too small? Children confined…

In the current economy and due to budget cuts certain services within the realm of Brevard County’s Family Court have been leased out to private organizations. These organizations are funded by other private organizations and corporations. Services such as supervised visitation and mediation are privatized out to organizations joined together as a collaborative group called Brevard Family Partnership.
Eckerd Youth Services provides visitation for families in the court system in Rockledge Florida. The visitation center contains offices and a receptionist area, including a lobby or waiting room, as some may call it. In their most spacious areas, upon entering the building, the lobby is welcoming and the receptionist is pleasant. They have three visitation rooms available for use of which are not much bigger than a walk in closet at best. In fact they are equivalent at best to the size of a Brevard County Jail Cell. One room is so small it is fitted with a couch, chair and a television. Having just enough room to sit down there would not even be enough room for the edition of a small coffee table.
The other two rooms are slightly larger but not even equaling the size of the receptionist office.

So with an objective observation, can it be implied the receptionist must sit comfortably behind their glass window in a spacious office? Are the rooms being used for the children and visitation too small? What is the impact on a child in need of services being young, impressionable and full of life and energy? What about the child who has A.D.H.D. and needs to disperse that energy with physical activity? Florida Administrative Code 64E-15.001 section 4 defines a habitable room as follows:

“Habitable Room” – means a room or enclosed floor space of a permanent living quarter used or intended to be used at a recreational camp for living, sleeping, cooking or eating purposes, excluding bathrooms, water closet compartments, laundries, pantries, foyers, connecting corridors, closets or other storage space.

How can such a room be considered for recreation? The visitation centers are supposed to be designed for families to enjoy their time together in a positive environment?

These conditions are placed upon families everyday. Furthermore, in such a small space there is little more to do other than observe a movie. If Eckerd Youth Services is providing supervised services for observing the family unit, how can that task be accomplished by merely movie watching? What kind of impairment does that place upon those families being in a room that can only be considered as confinement for both the child and the parent?

Observing the Eckerd Motto from their website located at http://www.eckerd.org , where it states they are the first name in second chances, one can only ponder what kind of second chance is being provided?

This has been another objective review.