Breaking news: In Brevard locals team up to conceal crimes

Brevard County Sheriff
Brevard County Sheriff
Roberto Gonzalez / Getty Images
In Brevard County it appears conspiracy and collusion has become the norm for some locals and attorneys who plot to conceal crimes to beat the statute of limitations. Major Andrew WaltersBrevard County Sheriff’s Department, stated the statute of limitations had run out and he could not comment on whether a crime was committed or not. Major Walters said there must be a report for them to investigate and he could not investigate if the statute of limitations had run out. Major Walters also stated he had no knowledge of the event until now. 

What happened? Who did it? How and why? The answer is simple although it may appear complex. May 17, 2013 an official inquiry was launched by T.O.R. with B.C.S.O. and today a follow has been requested.

Andrew Walters has 23-years of law enforcement service with the Brevard CountySheriff’s Office and currently Commands the Sheriff’s North Precinct. Mr. Walters served as the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office spokesperson for over 3 years (2005-2008). At the rank of Major, he served as a Countywide Watch Commander, Commanded the Special Operations Division and served as the Assistant Precinct Commander to North Precinct prior to his current assignment of Commanding the Sheriff’s North Precinct. He is the current President of Brevard County TRIAD Inc., a non-profit organization serving senior citizens in Brevard County. In addition to TRIAD, he serves on the Board of Directors for Central Florida Crimeline and Crosswinds Youth Services.

Accordingly, it would appear at first glance the statute of limitations has run out for a kidnapping that took place May 5th, 2010, found as fact in a court of law on June 17th, 2010, while the Melbourne Police Department made no arrest. Complaints were made about the Melbourne Officers involved and the Chief of Police Steve Mimbs was informed of their actions. Internal affairs would should have head up that investigation as the internal affairs unit is under direct authority of the Chief of Police.

These officers entered conflicting reports that falsify statements made by the parents in aid of the kidnapper, Yvonne Howard, and her attorney Scarlett Davidson of Culmer and Davidson P.A.. This is proven as they refused to issue a missing child report for a period of 2 weeks while the child was missing. At the time, Brevard County Sheriff’s Department said because it had taken place in Melbourne that it was the Melbourne Police Department’s Jurisdictionand they lacked jurisdiction. At that time the parents contacted the Florida Department of Law Enforcement who then contacted the Brevard County Sheriff’s Department who issued the missing child report 2 weeks after the child was kidnapped by Yvonne Howard as found as fact in a court of law according to Florida Statute 787.03 and 787.04.

As a point of law the statute of limitations indeed has run out on the initial act but it was also found by witnesses and 2 Florida Bar certified Attorneys on June 17, 2010 that Yvonne Howard was interfering again, with the ratifying actions of her attorney Scarlett Davidson attempting to conceal those acts, in which the statute of limitations has not run out on. Will they be allowed to avoid prosecution by the limitations again? The limitations on that incident will run out this June in 2013.

Further investigation shows a civil action was filed that is only allowed to go for approximately 60 to 120 days. However, that action, due to the actions and witness tampering by Attorney Scarlett Davidson, continued by Attorney Scarlett Davidson’s requests and vexatious litigation for a period of 3 years. A period required to avoid legal process on the original child abduction act committed by Scarlett Davidson’s client Yvonne Howard. The statute of limitations is 3 years and to no surprise the civil action, in which Judge Charles Crawford said ‘I have no Jurisdiction over felonies’, has continued for three years, surpassing the 120 day period.

Do local Brevard County attorneys have inside connections with law enforcement to conceal crimes and interfere with investigations? Do the superior officers in charge have knowledge of these actions within their departments? Will Sheriff Wayne Ivey address the issues the victimized families of Brevard County face today?

Major Walters stated the statute of limitations on the one incident had run out. He also stated he had no knowledge of the incident before May 2013. However, The Objective Review will be seeking further inquiry as a report was made and that report was sent to an officer no longer with Brevard County Sheriff’s Office.

How can a report be investigated by a retired officer? These are the serious questions left to Sheriff Wayne Ivey emitting from the Sheriff Jack Parker administration. Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey has been a law enforcement officer for over three decades. Sheriff Ivey is a graduate of the FBI National Academy and has a Bachelor’s Degree from Daytona State College in management and supervision. Sheriff Ivey’s background in law enforcement is inclusive of management, criminal investigations, narcotics, patrol services, public integrity investigations, and corrections. Sheriff Wayne Ivey, prior to being elected in 2012, served the citizens of the State of Florida as a resident agent in charge for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

The last question we have for inquiry is: Has Public Information Officer Fernes forwarded this inquiry to Sheriff Wayne Ivey? Constitutional government is authorized by the people through the authority of the constitutions. Do local Brevard County officials honor their oath to uphold the authority of their office?

The Florida Constitution in article 1 located at section 4 states: Freedom of speech and press.—Every person may speak, write and publish sentiments on all subjects but shall be responsible for the abuse of that right. No law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all criminal prosecutions and civil actions for defamation the truth may be given in evidence. ‘If the matter charged as defamatory is true and was published with good motives, the party shall be acquitted or exonerated.’

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

… this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.


About The Objective Review - Journalist Joseph Kirk
"so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news--that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent." ~John F. Kennedy Contributing to the people with passion and diligence through vigorous and tedious research to get the facts out for review. Political Correspondent for: General News Agency United Press Association News Examiner Demonstrating much prowess for informing the inquiring mind throughout the Republic of the United States of America. an accredited member of the General News Agency, United States Press Agency, United Press Association, US Press Association, The Examiner and The Objective Review. You can be confident that you have been objectively and fully informed. Correspondent Joseph Kirk:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: